So you’re implying what, exactly….

Today marked our second day of orientation. We actually got to delve into some cases. As dorky as it makes us sound I think we both enjoyed it. We were assigned two cases for today and then two cases for tomorrow. All four cases have to do with the implied warranty of merchantability. Ever heard of it? Yeah, me neither. But I’m sure I will be saying it in my sleep tonight. I’ll say it again, implied warranty of merchantability. Sounds sexy, huh? At the very least it sounds impressive.

Just to demonstrate how far his and I have fallen I’ll recap our evening for you:

We got home around 4:00. We raced online not to check our email, or our blog hits, but to check out our reading assignments for the first week. Now we can put those impressive looking books to use! Then in all of our excitement, we planned out our attack for studying this weekend and next week. Next we decided to brief our two cases for tomorrow. We read, and re-read the cases. (Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room was about the culinary integrity of the commonwealth of Massachusetts. Perfect for a couple of wannabe gourmand’s like ourselves). Then we discussed and briefed them. During dinner we continued to discuss the cases and then the very thing typical to law students happened. We began posing hypothetical scenarios to each other. We couldn’t even get away from it during our dinner “break”. We are turning into two wild and crazy law students. (I’ll see your foreign/natural test and raise you a reasonable expectation)

Anyway just thought you might all want to know how annoying we will be if anyone ever decides to invite us over to dinner again.

I'm off to bed and to sweet, sweet dreams of implied warranty of merchantability.