Please help me answer the following question:
What is the difference between an orthopedic surgeon and a puppy?
There's no right or wrong answer, but there is a prize for the answer that makes my tort professor laugh the most.
So think of something funny and witty, post it in the comments, and if I win I'll give you credit.
Thanks
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Hmm, I have no idea, but I'm passing this on to Rod. We can always count on him to be funny, right?
I think that a surgeon wouldn't eat your underwear if you leave them on the floor.
We should mention that doctors don't like lawyrs because we sue them and lawyers don't like doctors because they lobby congress for tort reform. So comments critical of doctors would probably score more points with the torts professor than comments critical of dogs. Not mentioning any names (Emily) just pointing out a fact of life :)
Hmm, tort reform, we're bordering on controversial :)
If you sue the orthopedic surgeon you get to pay out an-arm-and-a-leg and you still don't get anything because you obviously aren't as smart as the surgeon and don't know what you are talking about. If you sue the puppy you get to keep the puppy and you can sic it on the orthopedic surgeon who has no idea what he or she is doing. Either way, I choose the puppy. The last time I went to an orthopedic surgeon he wanted to break both of my ankles. Do you think I could have sued him now had my mother taken his advice?
Post a Comment